Property rights can be considered in terms of the difference between the object of
this right. Things, actions or services are the basis for the distribution of property rights
to property or the right to things and obligations. Real-life law represents the material
connection of a person with an object, and is characterized by a longer duration and
continuity; it is contained in full and direct domination over the subject and for its
execution does not require third parties.
Obligatory rights represent the material connection of a person with a person; they
do not suppress a person; the subject of their essence is the person, but actions in the
real sense, that is, the ability to evaluate, replacement: in the case of non-fulfillment of
obligations, the believer can be satisfied not by the action itself, but by its price or by
thing as an equivalent. This right by nature is the right to transiently; in itself, it is the
basis of its destruction: the committed obligation stops its existence. Obligatory rights
constitute the necessary condition and a means of success of the group.
The aforementioned right of power is a right arising from the relations of persons
as members of families and a social union, and has the object of a definite power over
the persons themselves and their activities. The right of the power does not dominate
the whole person, but only over a certain part of she, while the individual retains her
freedom, the ability to rights, and even acquires certain rights; so a woman in relation
to her husband, children in relation to parents, subjects and generally subordinate to
the head of state and his leader [9, p.154-155]. The rights of the authorities include the
rights of parental, family, guardians; but the real and full scope of these rights is in the
field of public law. The rights of the public in the majority are the rights of the
authorities, are formed in the management of the persons; some of them are called state
rights. Right-wing authorities are directed against certain persons, according to M. K.
Rennenkampf, and can only be used against them; but third parties may violate these
rights and, accordingly, prosecute violations.
The main achievement of M. K. Rennenkampf in the development of the theory
of human rights must be defined by the clear classification of rights given to them,
which, incidentally, coincides in many positions with the modern system of rights and
freedoms of the individual, and revealed their essence completely and perfectly.
A little later considering the essence of state law and the necessity of its existence,
another prominent Ukrainian lawyer M. I. Palienko determined: "Regardless of the
enormous political significance of the question of the legal unity of the state, the
binding force of law with respect to the subject of state power is the most important
issue of the theory of law: it is especially important, so to speak, that it has a vital
importance for the state law and science of this right "[8, p.302-304]. The formation of
the system of human rights M. I. Palienko associated with the formation of
constitutional states and noted that especially the order of the modern constitutional
state provides enough material for judging the right not only as a fact of one-sided rule,
- 154 -