heterogeneous phenomena in the logical framework of a certain concept, which reveals
their functional significance. In the literature, attempts were made to classify the
conditions of negative personality formation in the desocializing family. They are
divided into objective (violation of the structure of the family, poor housing conditions,
etc.) and subjective (the failure of parents to fulfill their duties on the upbringing of
children, inattention to their interests, etc.) [11].
Try to distinguish two groups of factors: 1) exercising a negative impact on the
person and 2) associated with uncontrollable by the family microenvironment [12].
Obviously, when preparing preventive measures, it is necessary to develop an unequal
approach to their neutralization.
Criterion of this classification criminologist allocate the place of the source of
desocialization of the personality of a minor: directly in the family or beyond.
Regarding the second situation (the person committed a crime under the influence of
an external source, and the family did not apply neutralizing influence), the question
arises – is it possible to talk about family desocialization at all in this case? This
question should be answered affirmatively, since the family did not implement the
socialization of the individual, did not realize the program set by the society to protect
the child from undesirable influences. Classification of the factors of family
desocialization can simultaneously be considered as a classification of types of
disadvantage desocializing families. Applying to her an additional criterion – the ratio
of the family to the onset of a criminal result, we get a hierarchy of family
desocialization. Two types of disadvantaged families can be distinguished: 1) with their
own source of desocialization; 2) those who do not oppose the external source of
socialization [6].
Among the general social factors that influence on the formation of disadvantaged
desocialized families, in the field of their functioning, D.A. Shestakov distinguishes
two groups: 1) the contradiction directly to the family and 2) other general social
contradictions. The first is closely linked with the ongoing restructuring, in family
relations. The second ones determine the criminalization of the individual, they are
housed through other social channels (reference group, affiliate company, informal
group at work). The family always consists of specific individuals, and if the person
has anti-social qualities (no matter where they have acquired them), then, being
manifested in family communication, these qualities can negatively effect on the other
family members [6].
Thus, I.P. Vasylkivska offers the following classification of families: families
with negative moral and legal characteristics of parents and families with limited
educational opportunities of adults [16].
It's should be paying attention to the results of the criminological study of the
influence of the family on deviant behavior, juveniles conducted by S. L. Sibiryakov
- 1027 -