In accordance with our considerations, in order to generalize formal and doctrinal
points of view regarding the place and role of investment safety of the state, the
following directions of its interpretation can be distinguished: through the prism and
link with financial safety; as an integral part of innovation safety; as an independent
component of economic safety; as a complex of measures that provides the proper level
of investment; as a state of safety of investment safety objects.
Investment safety in its narrow sense and based on the integrated approach is
considered as a priority component of economic safety, which involves protecting
investment objects from internal and external threats and their rational involvement in
innovation processes. In the broader sense we interpret this type of safety as a set of
measures that includes the development and unconditional implementation of targeted
programs aimed at stabilizing the investment environment, counteracting real threats
to investment safety and promoting the realization of national interests in the
investment sphere developed and implemented by investment safety subjects through
the effective attraction and use of domestic and foreign resources in the processes of
expanded reproduction in order to implement an innovative type of national economy
development.
The proper state of investment safety is the result of the effective interaction of
its system elements, which is evaluated as a rational and effective influence of its
subjects, aimed at realizing national interests in the investment sphere, thus involving
a more in-depth study of the nature of its subjective support.In accordance with the
Law of Ukraine "On Fundamentals of National Safety", the subjects of ensuring
national safety are: President of Ukraine; Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine; Cabinet of
Ministers of Ukraine; National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine; ministries
and other central executive bodies; National Bank of Ukraine; courts of general
jurisdiction; Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine; National Anti-Corruption Bureau of
Ukraine [8].
The author [6] suggests that the state and its institutions (ministries, departments,
tax and customs authorities, stock exchanges, funds and insurance companies), as well
as enterprises, institutions and organizations of the state and private sectors of the
economy should act as economic safety entities. In our opinion, a suitable classification
of subjects of investment safety is according to the criterion of the hierarchy of
influence: world economic society, state, region, enterprise, personality. The quality of
interaction between the subjects of investment safety determines the extent to which it
can be implemented in the context of ensuring the interests and ability to counteract
various types of threats.
Taking into consideration the direction of research, we suggest that the subjects
of investment safety should be classified in accordance with an institutional criterion.
Under the institutions, we mean government agencies and non-state representative
- 654 -