11.
Kosmeda, T. (2017). Problems of Linguistics of Text Interpretation of
Intimaxation Category. Linguistic Studies. Vol. 33, 103-108 [in English].
12.
Kramar, N.U. (2017). Towards the Integrative Approach to Identity
Constructionin Academic Discourse. Linguistic Studies. Vol. 33, 113 – 120 [in
English].
13.
Arnold, I.V. (1990). Stilistika sovremennogo angliyskogo yazyika:
(Stilistika dekodirovaniya) [Stylistics of Modern English Language]. Moscow,
Russia: Prosveschenie [in Russian].
14.
Vinogradov, V.V. (1971). O teorii hudozhestvennoy rechi [About a Theory
of Artistic Speech]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka Publ. [in Russian].
15.
Zhyrmunskiy, V.M. (1928). Voprosyi teorii literaturyi [The Question about
Literary Theory]. Leningrad, Russia: Acadimia Publ. [in Russian].
16.
Solganik, G.Ya. (1978). Stilistika gazetnyih zhanrov [Stylistics of
Newspaper Style]. Moscow, Russia: MGU [in Russian].
17.
Galperin, I.R. (2014). Tekst kak ob'ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text
as an Object of Linguistics Studies]. Moscow, Russia; Editorial URSS [in Russian].
18.
Maugham, W. S. (1972). The Moon and Sixpence. Moscow, Russia:
Progress [in English].
19.
Priestley, J B. (1974). Angel Pavement. Moscow, Russia: Progress [in
English].
20.
Green, G. (2004). The Quiet American. Мoscow, Russia: Manager [in
English].
21.
Dijk T.A. (1980). Macrostructures: an Interdisciplinary Study of Global
Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition Text. Hillsdale, N.Y.: Erlbaum
Publ [in English].
22.
Givon, T. (1993). Coherence in Text, Coherence in Mind. Pragmatics and
Cognition, (issue 1), University of Oregon: Eugene [in English].
23.
Halliday, М.А.К., Hasan R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London:
Longman[in English].
24.
Redeker, G. (2000). Coherence and structure in text and discourse.
Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue. Studies i Computational Pragmanics.
Amsterdam: Benjamins [in English].
25.
Selivanova. E.A. (2004). Osnovyi lingvisticheskoy teorii teksta i
kommunikatsii [The Basis of Linguistics Theory of the Text and Communication].
Kyiv, Ukraine: Brama [in Russian].
26.
Mihaylenko, V.V. (1982). Analysis of the Text: pragmalingvistics relations.
Communicative and Poetic Functions of Literary Text, Vol.1, 102– 107 [in English].
27. Scott, A. Crossley, Kristopher K. (2016). The tool for the automatic analysis
of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion.
- 490 -